Recommendations to conserve the great white shark in the Cape's False Bay basin while offering protection to bathers were at an advanced stage, shark experts said on Wednesday.
"The report tries to walk the middle road, it is a voice of reason," said Dr Deon Nel, aquatic unit manager at the World Wide Fund for Nature South Africa.
He was referring to an initiative to try to find ways of reconciling the safety of recreational bathers and, at the same time, conserve the maligned Great White in an area famous for its presence.
Nel said a specialist workshop was convened in May between a group of shark experts representing various institutions and government departments.
At this meeting a number of recommendations on great white shark conservation, management and mitigation, recreational safety, emergency response and communication and awareness were agreed on.
Nel said a salient recommendation tried to overcome the nettle of authority and jurisdiction, with the department of environmental affairs and Tourism, South African National Parks and the City of Cape Town all having a vested interest in False Bay and its denizens, both gilled and two-legged.
"A key recommendation is that the existing Great White shark working group, which has representation from all tiers of government, be constituted on a more formal basis," Nel said.
Another important recommendation was that "non-invasive shark mitigation measures", such as the shark-spotting programme, were considered to be more appropriate than capture devices, such as nets found along the Durban coastline.
Great white sharks are listed as a protected species in South Africa.
They may only be captured for scientific purposes when a special permit is issued.
Nel said shark numbers dived during the 1980s as trophy gatherers eager to show off the shark's impressive tooth-rimmed jaws took to the water in a frenzy.
He said there was no accurate data on Great White numbers in False Bay - the site of a number of fatal human predations and maimings over the years.
Less than a week ago, Fish Hoek lifesaver Lyle Maasdorp, 19, survived a close encounter with a presumed Great White when it attacked his surf-ski and bit a sizeable chunk out of it.
Maasdorp escaped unharmed.
Data from the Natal Sharks Board shows there were six shark attacks, three of them fatal, around the Cape Peninsula between 2003 and 2005.
Two of the six attacks occurred at Noordhoek beach on the Atlantic ocean side, with the remaining four in the False Bay area.
And with great white numbers stabilising and possibly even increasing, Nel cautioned against the false belief, often in the thrashing aftermath of an attack, that more sharks meant more attacks.
"There are many variables, although the one that swamps all others is the increase in recreational bathers in the water.
"More and more people venture further off-shore.
"Surfing, surf-ski paddling and spear fishing are popular sports," he said.
"Improvements in wetsuits also mean more people venture into the water."
He said the City of Cape Town was drafting a policy document, informed by May's recommendations and substantiated by 15 scientific papers, which would guide the safety aspects of people and sharks in False Bay.
"The outcome of the May meeting has informed the development of the strategy that we will be putting forward to the City of Cape Town for adoption later this year, possibly September," said city environmentalist Gregg Oelofse.
He said the findings and recommendations would be made available to the public for their information and comment.
Herman Oosthuizen of the department of environmental affairs and tourism said the recommendations were being formalised so that "solid" proposals could be put forward.
"Then they go to top management and the minister (Marthinus van Schalkwyk).